Treatment Options for Footrot: Sheep
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15700993Keywords:
Foot, lameness, sheepAbstract
The most productive animal husbandry that can be done in Turkey is sheep farming. It provides a suitable environment with its climate, natural structure and agriculture. In places where pasture animal husbandry is done, sheep farming is especially preferred. Foot diseases have an important place in sheep farming. It is quite effective on meat, milk, fertility and wool yield. It causes significant economic losses both individually and as a flock. Footrot is known as the most important of infectious sheep foot diseases. The disease occurs with the single or synergistic effect of predisposing and causing factors. Constantly moist and wet ground in pens and pastures depending on the climate and season, inadequate attention is paid to hoof care, mineral deficiency in rations and the involvement of infectious agents such as Fusobacterium necrophorum and Dichelobacter nodosus are effective in the formation of the disease. The main reasons for the regional differences in the disease are reported as climate, shelter and nutrition. In addition to these, racial predisposition due to congenital posture disorders is effective in the formation of the disease. Especially in places where pasture animal husbandry is done, the formation of diseases is also shaped due to trauma and contusions that directly affect the hoof. Based on these reasons, it is not possible to obtain a disease-free flock by only keeping good quality animals. All the factors listed should be taken into consideration and the animals should definitely be under the control of breeders or caretakers. Because with good observation and control, diseases can be detected at an acute level and the treatment process can be started early. Footrot is a specific infectious foot disease. The disease is characterized by inflammation and necrosis of the interdigital skin. In the formation of footrot, Fusobacterium necrophorum affects the interdigital skin and causes a foul-smelling exudative inflammation only in the skin part, while Dichelobacter nodosus acts by secreting a proteolytic enzyme that destroys the epidermal tissue. It is the most important reason for the welfare problem in sheep breeding. Yield losses due to footrot consist of meat, milk, offspring and wool, while economic losses consist of treatment and care costs. The fact that sheep are considered as a flock and losses are tolerable does not require treatment. In this review, treatment options for footrot, which significantly affects sheep breeding in our country, are discussed based on current information.
References
Abbott KA, Lewis CJ. 2005. Current approaches to the management of ovine footrot. The Veterinary Journal, 169(1), 28-41.
Akkuş RF ve Baran V. 2023. Koyun Ayak Hastalıklarında Mera Öncesi ve Sonrası Kullanılan Ayak Banyolarının Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesi, Doktora Tezi, Kafkas Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Akman N. (2001). Koyunculuk: Dünya'da-Avrupa Birliği'nde-Türkiye'de hayvansal üretim ve ticareti. Çamlıca Kültür ve Yardım Vakfı Yayınları: 4, İstanbul
Alkan F. 1998. Konya Bölgesindeki Koyunlarda Görülen Piyeten’in Etiyolojisinde Çinko ve Bakırın Rolü; TC Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Cerrahi (Vet) Anabilim Dalı (Doctoral dissertation, Doktora Tezi, Konya-1998).
Alkan F. 2017. Koyunlarda ayak hastalıkları ve genel yaklaşım. 3. Koyun-Keçi Sağlığı ve Yönetimi Kongresi, 23-32.
Allworth MB. 2014. Challenges in ovine footrot control, Small Ruminant Research 118, 110–113.
Anonim. https://www.arkor.com.tr/hayvanlarin-ayak-sagligini-beslenme-ile-koruyun, Erişim Tarihi:14.12.2024, Saat:15.38
Avki S ve ark. 2004. Burdur yöresi koyunlarında ayak hastalıklarının dağılımı ve çevresel faktörler yönünden değerlendirilmesi. Veteriner Cerrahi Dergisi, 10(1-2), 5-12.
Bagley CV. 1998. Sheep lameness In: The Merck Veterinary Manuel. (ed.) By Susan E. Aiello, 8th, Pp. 850-855, National Publishing Inc., Philadelphia
Baran V ve ark. 2015. The effects of pasture characteristics and seasonal differences on sheep foot diseases A field study on the Kars and Iğdır regions Turkey, Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 21 (3) pp. 377-382
Bulut S. 1982. Elazığ ve yöresi koyun ve keçilerde görülen Piyetenin etiyoloji, klinik seyir, epidemiyolojisi ile sağıtımlarının karşılaştırmalı araştırması. Doktora Tezi, Fırat Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Enst., Elazığ.
Demertzis PN. 1980. Foot-Rot: Facts And Fiction. Thirt International Symposium On”Disorders Of The Ruminant Digit” 1-5 Th October. Viana, Austria.
Dhungyel O ve ark. 2013. Comparative study of the commonly used virulence tests for laboratory diagnosis of ovine footrot caused by Dichelobacter nodosus in Australia. Veterinary microbiology, 162(2-4), 756-760.
Dhungyel O ve ark. 2014. Footrot vaccines and vaccination. Vaccine, 32(26), 3139-3146.
Duncan JS ve ark. 2014. Contagious ovine digital dermatitis: an emerging disease. The Veterinary Journal, 201(3), 265-268.
Egerton JR ve Laing EA. 1978. Bacterial infections in the aetiology of foot disease of ruminants the second symposium on “bovine digital disease” 25- 28th September. Sakara, Sweden.
Egerton JR. 2000. Foot rot and other foot conditions. In disease of sheep. Ed. Martın.
Egerton JR ve Parsonson IM. 1969. Benign footrot – a specifik interdigital dermatitis of sheep associated with infection by less proteolytic strains of fusiformis nodosus. Aust. Vet. J., 169, 28–44.
Frosth S: Dichelobacter nodosus and footrot in Swedish sheep. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Doktora Tezi, 71 s. Uppsala, 2016.
Glynn T. 1993. Benign footrot–an epidemiological investigation into the occurrence, effects on production, response to treatment and influence of environmental factors. Australian veterinary journal, 70(1), 7-12.
Green LE ve George TRN. 2008. Assessment of current knowledge of footrot in sheep with particular reference to Dichelobacter nodosus and implications for elimination or control strategies for sheep in Great Britain. The Veterinary Journal, 175(2), 173-180.
Grogono-Thomas R ve Johnston KM. 1997. A study of ovine lameness. MAFF Open Contract OC59 45K. MAFF final report.
Iqbal A ve ark. 2011. Foot rot–An emerging issue in sheep husbandry. International Journal of Livestock Research, 1 (1), 5-16.
İn M ve Sarıtaş ZK. 2014. Afyon bölgesi koyunlarında ayak hastalıkları prevalansının araştırılması. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 7(1), 17-25.
İzci C. 1993. Koyunlarda Önemli Bir Ayak Hastalığı; Piyeten (Foot-Rot). Hasad. 8 (94): 26-28.
İzci C ve ark. 1994. Konya Bölgesi Koyunlarında Görülen Ekstremite ve Ayak Hastalıklarının Klinik ve Radyolojik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Vet Bil Derg, 10, 16-21.
Kaler J ve ark. 2012. A Clinical trial comparing parenteral oxytetrcyline and enrofloxacin on time to recovery in sheep lame with acute chronic footrot in kashmir, india. BMC Veterinary Research, 12; 1-8.
Konig HE, Lıebıch HG: Veterinary Anatomy of Domestic Mammals Textbook and Colour Atlas. 3rd ed, (Stuttgart) Germany, Schattauer, 637–642, 2007.
Korkmaz H ve Aslan L. 2008. Van ve yöresinde sığır ve koyunlarda görülen cerrahi hastalıkların değerlendirilmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 37-42.
Liu D ve Yong WK. 1997. Improved laboratory diagnosis of ovine
footrot:an update, The Veterinary Journal, Volume 153, Issue 1, January, 99-105.
Okay H. 2019. Elazığ Ve Diyarbakır Yöresi Koyun Ayak
Hastalıklarının Değerlendirilmesi Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı.
Parajuli B ve Goddard 1989. A comparison of the efficacy of footbaths containing formalin or zinc sulphate in treating ovine foot-rot under field conditions. British Veterinary Journal, 145(5), 467-472.
Pugh D G. 2012. Sheep and Goat Medicine. Elsevier, 291-324.
Raadsma HW ve Egerton JR. 2013. A review of footrot in sheep: Aetiology, risk factors and control methods. Livestock Science, 156(1-3), 106-114.
Reed GA ve Alley DU. 1996. Efficacy of a novel copper‐based footbath preparation for the treatment of ovine footrot during the spread period. Australian veterinary journal, 74(5), 375-382.
Roberts DS ve Egerton JR. 1969. The aetiology and pathogenesis of ovine foot-rot: II. The pathogenic association of Fusiformis nodosus and F. necrophorus. Journal of comparative pathology, 79(2), 217-227.
Ross AD. 1983. Formalin and footrot in sheep. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 31(10), 170-172.
Sağlıyan ve ark. 2003. Elâzığ Bölgesinde koyunlarda görülen piyeten’in etyolojisinde çinko ve bakırın rolü. Veteriner cerrahi dergisi, 9(1-2), 11-16.
Sargıson N. 2001. Ovine digital dermatitis. UK. Vet. 6, 59-60.
Venning CM ve ark. 1990. Treatment of virulent footrot with lincomycin and spectinomycin. Australian veterinary journal, 67(7), 258-260.
Wani AH ve ark. 2019. Determination of prevalence, serological diversity, and virulence of Dichelobacter nodosus in ovine footrot with identification of its predominant serotype as a potential vaccine candidate in J&K, India, Trop Anim Health Prod., Jun;51(5):1089-1095.
Wassink GJ ve Green LE. 2001. Farmers' practices and attitudes towards foot rot in sheep. The Veterinary Record, 149(16), 489-490.
Winter, A. (2008). Lameness in sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 76 (1-2), 149-53.
Winter, A. C. (2009). Footrot control and eradication (elimination) strategies. Small Ruminant Research, 86(1-3), 90-93.
Winter, A. C. (2011). Treatment and control of hoof disorders in sheep and goats. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice, 27(1), 187-192.
Yavru N. Özkan K. Elma E. 1990. Küçük Ruminantların Ayak Hastalıkları, “Ayak Hastalıkları ve Ortopedi”. Selçuk Üniv. Vet. Fak. Yayınları, 188-192.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Raziye Filiz AKKUŞ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.